From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Feb 6 22: 3:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E4537B491 for ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 22:03:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1763DV15043; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 22:03:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com) To: Charles Randall Cc: "'Alfred Perlstein'" , "Paul D. Schmidt" , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: known pthread bug? In-Reply-To: Message from Charles Randall of "Tue, 06 Feb 2001 21:57:26 MST." <5FE9B713CCCDD311A03400508B8B3013054E3F76@bdr-xcln.is.matchlogic.com> Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2001 22:03:13 -0800 Message-ID: <15039.981525793@winston.osd.bsdi.com> From: Jordan Hubbard Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Why isn't ERRATA updated to reflect this? Should there be a "Known and > acknowledged bugs" section in ERRATA? The entire ERRATA is essentially a section like you describe, it just doesn't always get updated. :-( If any of the CVS committers see an errata-worthy item go by in the repository, they're free to edit www/en/releases/${release}/errata.sgml any time by the way. It's something I've certainly always tried to do when I had the time, but I don't always have the time right now. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message