From owner-freebsd-current Fri Aug 9 17:57:11 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA21944 for current-outgoing; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 17:57:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA21935 for ; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 17:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAA24189; Fri, 9 Aug 1996 17:56:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199608100056.RAA24189@austin.polstra.com> To: faulkner@asgard.bga.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Praise for CVSup In-reply-to: <199608092255.RAA11770@utgard.bga.com> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 17:56:55 -0700 From: John Polstra Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Blessed be CVSup. Verily, I have used it and my povray problem > hath fled in haste. Praise is always welcome, of course, but ... I don't understand. You're not implying that CVSup fixed povray, are you? I was just _sure_ I had taken out the experimental "auto-fix-bugs" feature before I made the public release. :-) I wouldn't even ask this, but you said in a different posting that CVSup had "fixed something in my tree that sup wouldn't fix." It's sort of hard for me to imagine what that might be. If you ignore the details, they both do the same thing. Namely, they find files that are different on the client and server, and make them the same. Can you give us some details about what you're referring to? Thanks, John