From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 22:10:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0DB16A4DA for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:10:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C1B7843D46 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:10:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 25159 invoked by uid 399); 24 Aug 2006 22:10:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Aug 2006 22:10:41 -0000 Message-ID: <44EE23DD.7050401@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:10:37 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger References: <44ED0427.6010402@bellsouth.net> <44EE116C.4010802@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: B Briggs , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster patch for testing CONFLICTS and dependency list (Was: Re: portmaster and dependencies) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:10:44 -0000 Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:51:56 -0500, Doug Barton wrote: > > >> I've created a patch that has the dependency list change, plus the >> experimental work I'm doing on trying to handle alternate dependencies >> via >> CONFLICTS. It's at >> http://dougbarton.us/portmaster-conflicts-depends.patch. >> I would appreciate it if folks could at least test the dependency list >> hunk >> of that patch, and report back if they have any problems. As I said, it >> _should_ work, but it's a non-trivial change and I don't want to screw >> things up for anyone. > > Awsome! I can test it in the next week or so. Right now, I am working on > install KDE and GNOME 2.15.x together in jail for conflict stuff by > merge into a prefix. When I am done w/ it, then I can test your patch by > upgrade GNOME 2.14.x to 2.15.x. It is a huge upgrade, so let's see how > portmaster can handles it. :-) Well I did the last round of torture testing by doing basically what you're doing now, first installing gnome from scratch, then installing kde from scratch. So hopefully it will perform well. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection