From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 19 09:03:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AE037B401 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:03:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 94FC543F85 for ; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 09:03:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mdcki@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 23912 invoked by uid 65534); 19 Jun 2003 16:03:35 -0000 Received: from pD9E2DC58.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO gmx.net) (217.226.220.88) by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 19 Jun 2003 18:03:35 +0200 Message-ID: <3EF1DF15.50209@gmx.net> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 18:04:37 +0200 From: Marcin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030517 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pl, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jan Grant References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: hackers cc: Michael Bushkov Subject: Re: nscd for freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 16:03:38 -0000 Jan Grant wrote: > On Thu, 19 Jun 2003, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > > >>Michael Bushkov wrote: >> >>>Good day! >>>Can anyone tell me if there is an implementation of nscd for FreeBSD? >>>If there is no, who's currently working on it? >> >>You can use bind in caching only mode. A far suprerior solution >>to the problem at hand. So there is no need for "takoje malenkoje gawno" as >>nscd is under Linux. > > > Recent discussions on -arch surprisingly managed to avoid the knee-jerk > reactions due to other nscd _implementations_ while discussing the > need to make /bin dynamically loaded to support NSS &co. The alternative > (lookupd) approach was raised and seemed to find favour, but I don't > know if that tactic has been adopted. FWIW I think it makes a lot of > sense. Never mind I was just still under the "impression" of the nscd from the glibc package. It's making for example mozilla mourn for ages when you misstype an URL... Even for the common case of APACHE log analysis it's unusable, becouse quite commonly it will just overload the system bejoind hope...