From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 18:08:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C6916A4D1 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:08:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A15A343D55 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 18:08:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 75088 invoked by uid 1002); 4 Feb 2004 02:08:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) (64.58.1.252) by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 4 Feb 2004 02:08:16 -0000 Message-ID: <40205387.2040906@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 19:05:59 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031103 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Melvyn Sopacua References: <016f01c3ea33$182e1210$1b01a8c0@itg.ti.com> <20040203213646.GB9261@xor.obsecurity.org> <40201EA3.2040106@freebsd.org> <200402040252.18639.freebsd-questions@webteckies.org> In-Reply-To: <200402040252.18639.freebsd-questions@webteckies.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: FreeBSD RE Team cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: 4 CD ISOs for 5.2 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 02:08:25 -0000 Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > On Tuesday 03 February 2004 23:20, Scott Long wrote: > >>Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >>>On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:52:14PM +0100, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: >>> >>>>On Tuesday 03 February 2004 13:41, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>>> >>>>>Only the first 2 CDs are made available on the FTP site. The other >>>>>two contain a subset of packages; the full set of packages is >>>>>available on the FTP site, just not in ISO format. >>>> >>>>Regarding the first cd: >>>>make release >>>>only creates a 'mini-install', not the 600M iso that is on the site. This >>>>one misses perl for one and some dependencies fail. >>> >>>AFAIK packages are included by hand. >> >>Correct. We've talked about enhancing the scripts so that this gets >>included automatically, but it can be problematic since the source >>location of the packages might be unknown at the time of the build. > > > Do you mean the distfiles here, or the resulting packages? > If talking about the packages, isn't it as simple as moving the > $CHROOT_DIR/usr/ports/packages into $CHROOT_DIR/R/cdrom and using a similar > approach as portupgrade? Otherwise an ls */*/*.tbz should print a workable > list. > > If the distfiles, then one can advise in the release manpage, to do: > /usr/src/release/scripts/print-cdrom-packages.sh 1 | xargs portinstall > --fetch-only > > and then proceed with RELEASEDISTFILES argument. > The only problem with this is that it's quite common during the RC and BETA phases for the package set to not yet be available through normal means. > Life would be a lot simpler if portupgrade was moved into base :) > Yeah, but that would require putting Ruby into the base, and you'd have an all-out revolt on your hands if that happened. Scott