From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Apr  9 08:50:48 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA27561
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 08:50:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dg-rtp.dg.com (dg-rtp.rtp.dg.com [128.222.1.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA27556
          for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 08:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02)
	id AA21831; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 11:50:03 -0400
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org by dg-rtp.dg.com.rtp.dg.com; Wed,  9 Apr 1997 11:50 EDT
Received: from dg-rtp.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by ponds.water.net (8.8.3/8.7.3) with UUCP id LAA07424 for freefall.cdrom.com!freebsd-hackers; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 11:08:12 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail.webspan.net by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02)
	id AA16541; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 11:10:14 -0400
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.18]) 
          by mail.webspan.net (WEBSPAN/970116) with ESMTP id LAA26866;
          Wed, 9 Apr 1997 11:09:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from jmb@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA24479;
          Wed, 9 Apr 1997 08:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@freefall.FreeBSD.org>
Message-Id: <199704091509.IAA24479@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ucbvax.Berkeley.edu
To: ponds!ponds!rivers (Thomas David Rivers)
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 08:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ponds!ponds!freefall.cdrom.com!freebsd-hackers
In-Reply-To: <199704090122.VAA07502@lakes.water.net> from "Thomas David Rivers" at Apr 8, 97 09:22:22 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Thomas David Rivers wrote:
> 
> 
> Well - I have some interesting news to report.
> 
> After freefall's sendmail was corrected; I no longer see 
> the strange introduction of ucbvax.Berkeley.edu.
> 
> However; I am seeing a strange introduction of uu.uunet.net.
> 
> I'm beginning to suspect freefall.cdrom.com's sendmail.cf isn't
> properly handling some uucp addresses... although exactly which
> ones I can't say; because it seems to handle most.

	freefall is not uucp connected.  all uucp mail is relayed
	thru uu.uunet.net.  they still do uucp, i believe.
	what do you suggest?
	dont be shy, uucp is not my forte ;)

jmb