Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Jan 2003 10:47:29 -0600
From:      "Jack L. Stone" <jackstone@sage-one.net>
To:        Mike Meyer <mwm-dated-1043507709.fae292@mired.org>
Cc:        Per olof Ljungmark <peo@intersonic.se>, Mark <admin@asarian-host.net>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Shutdown for APC Back-UPS 350 CS
Message-ID:  <3.0.5.32.20030120104729.011becd0@mail.sage-one.net>
In-Reply-To: <15916.4730.203618.74993@guru.mired.org>
References:  <3.0.5.32.20030119192238.011becd0@mail.sage-one.net> <3.0.5.32.20030119185811.011becd0@mail.sage-one.net> <3.0.5.32.20030119192238.011becd0@mail.sage-one.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 09:15 AM 1.20.2003 -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
>In <3.0.5.32.20030119192238.011becd0@mail.sage-one.net>, Jack L. Stone
<jackstone@sage-one.net> typed:
>> At 02:05 AM 1.20.2003 +0100, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
>> I have been asking WHY have a cable with a dumb UPS for a long time and yet
>> to get a good answer. I have tested with instruments the pins on those
>> cables and very little to nothing found in a way of a signal. If you go to
>> that apcupsd URL and did down you will find all (most) of the cables and it
>> also explains them. SmartUPSes -- yes -- okay and will work with the cable.
>> The computer may sense the dumb UPS -- BUT, will not communicate about
>> shutdown and other critical info. If I'm wrong, then let me know.... I
>> spent a lot of time falling for the "cable" bit.
>
>Even a "dumb" UPS communicates with the machine - with the right
>cable. The computer gets three signals: On battery power, off battery
>power, and almost out of battery. The computer can send one signal to
>the UPS, telling it to turn off and stay off. The idea is that you use
>the last signal from the UPS to initiate a shutdown, and the last
>thing you do as you shut down is tell the UPS to go off and stay off.
>
>I have as yet to figure out how to get FreeBSD to signal the UPS to
>shut down in a safe way. Anyone else worked on this one? Maybe in 5.0?
>
>	<mike
>-- 
>Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>		http://www.mired.org/consulting.html
>Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.
>

Let me clarify that I did not coin the classification "smartUPSes" and
"dumbUPSes", but suffice it to say that anyone who buys a UPS without the
ability to fully communicate as does the ones designated as "SmartUPS" (or
SmartPro... too?) should not expect the results of one. There are two
classes - "smart" and "dumb" as far as I know. So, before buying and one
wants to have full bi-directional functionality, make sure it has the
capability. Don't just go by "it has a cable" and let the cable fool you
otherwise. Unfortunately, I have never seen a box that explained this on
the outside or even the inside of a "dumb" one -- with cable.

Best regards,
Jack L. Stone,
Administrator

SageOne Net
http://www.sage-one.net
jackstone@sage-one.net

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.20030120104729.011becd0>