Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 14:57:13 -0700 From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> Cc: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, Jason Unovitch <junovitch@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r416439 - head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs Message-ID: <201704012157.v31LvDJq035490@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> of "Sat, 01 Apr 2017 23:40:24 %2B0200." <02a45cdf-904b-1306-5d93-4dcc82f39cea@mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <02a45cdf-904b-1306-5d93-4dcc82f39cea@mat.cc>, Mathieu Arnold writes : > Le 01/04/2017 à 22:20, Cy Schubert a écrit : > > In message <201606052250.u55Mo44E016592@repo.freebsd.org>, Jason Unovitch > > write > > s: > >> Author: junovitch > >> Date: Sun Jun 5 22:50:04 2016 > >> New Revision: 416439 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416439 > >> > >> Log: > >> sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: pass MAINTAINER to submitter > >> > >> PR: 209976 > >> Submitted by: DuÅ¡an VejnoviÄ <freebsd@dussan.org> > >> > >> Modified: > >> head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/Makefile > >> > >> Modified: head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/Makefile > >> ========================================================================== > === > >> = > >> --- head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/Makefile Sun Jun 5 22:38:48 2016 > >> (r416438) > >> +++ head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs/Makefile Sun Jun 5 22:50:04 2016 > >> (r416439) > >> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ MASTER_SITES= http://tuxera.com/opensour > >> PKGNAMEPREFIX= fusefs- > >> DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-3g_ntfsprogs-${PORTVERSION} > >> > >> -MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org > >> +MAINTAINER= freebsd@dussan.org > >> COMMENT= Mount NTFS partitions (read/write) and disk images > >> > >> LICENSE= GPLv2 > >> > >> > > Is there a reason we grant maintainer on a simple maintainer request? It > > used to be that a MAINTAINER was given maintainership only when a patch was > > > submitted not a patch to just change MAINTAINER. Has this policy changed? > > The policy has not changed, those commits should not happen, but, well, > they do. <sigh> indeed. > > > There have been updates posted by the upline over the past 14 months but no > > > updates to the port. I'd like to update the port. > > Open a PR with the patch, and wait for the maintainer to either approve > it or 14 days to timeout. Already done. Lucky for me he approved very quickly. Having said that, personally, I expect a maintainer to keep a port up to date. That's now I got my ports bit, initially. I kept submitting PRs and sending patches to nectar@ (my ports mentor) until he literally got sick of my constant pestering and sent me an invite. I kind of think maintainers would want to do that. It is what it is I guess. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201704012157.v31LvDJq035490>