From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 8 01:44:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF1A16A4CE for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:44:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from exchange.newgensol.com (exchange.newgensol.com [193.41.183.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C63A43D2F for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 01:44:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from george@swentek.mine.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by exchange.newgensol.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DADD1F39AA for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:44:24 +0200 (EET) Received: from exchange.newgensol.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (exchange.newgensol.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 32782-03 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:44:23 +0200 (EET) Received: from DA (unknown [193.41.182.5]) by exchange.newgensol.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 523601F36F5 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:44:23 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <000601c404f2$441610b0$2520a8c0@DA> From: "George Swentek" To: Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 11:46:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Antivir doesn't work on local 5.x file system, but works fine X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 09:44:47 -0000 Martin, I think this is an error for sure, because I tested what you = told me=20 and it appears that even with -s option antivir doesn't perform = recursive scanning=20 on the directories, which is its normal behaviour. Also I think that H+B = are using some old function in their code that has been modified in 5.X and that is the = reason for this problems.( We get precompiled binary and they are doing it on 4.X = .. ) I installed 5.X installation over 4.X file system and the error was = still present! =20 Personally moved the directories I need to be scanned on different = partition and this=20 solved my problem , but they should fix that thing. Regards, George Swentek