From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct  8 17:51:54 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C9516A40F;
	Sun,  8 Oct 2006 17:51:54 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de)
Received: from mailgate01.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE
	[134.93.178.131])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAF943D46;
	Sun,  8 Oct 2006 17:51:52 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de)
Received: from exfront02.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.56])
	by mailgate01.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 08 Oct 2006 19:51:52 +0200
Received: from mail.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.56]) by
	exfront02.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); 
	Sun, 8 Oct 2006 19:51:52 +0200
Received: from [192.168.1.128] ([85.178.18.39] RDNS failed) by
	mail.uni-mainz.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft
	SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 8 Oct 2006 19:51:51 +0200
Message-ID: <45293AAD.9090205@mail.uni-mainz.de>
Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:51:41 +0200
From: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060917)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ceri Davies <ceri@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200610081720.k98HKkQx058984@freefall.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <200610081720.k98HKkQx058984@freefall.freebsd.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Oct 2006 17:51:51.0885 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[6F721FD0:01C6EB02]
Cc: maho@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/85820: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than
 SCHED_4BSD
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Oct 2006 17:51:54 -0000

Ceri Davies wrote:
> Synopsis: 1.5 times slower performance with SCHED_ULE than SCHED_4BSD
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: ceri
> State-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 17:19:36 UTC 2006
> State-Changed-Why: 
> ULE is no longer the default scheduler, and no longer has a maintainer.
> This is an interesting test case though.
>
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-bugs
> Responsible-Changed-By: ceri
> Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Oct 8 17:19:36 UTC 2006
> Responsible-Changed-Why: 
> Scheduler problem.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=85820
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>   
Very interesting to read. And this is now the end of the newly
introduced allround weapon for more scalability?