From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 27 09:00:45 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617B237B447 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:00:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A61143FE1 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 09:00:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h5RG07E1077015; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:00:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:00:05 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030627.100005.122061731.imp@bsdimp.com> To: mark@grondar.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <200306261913.h5QJDIig001490@grimreaper.grondar.org> References: <3EF94580.90001@reversedhell.net> <200306261913.h5QJDIig001490@grimreaper.grondar.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: aanton@reversedhell.net Subject: Re: replacing sendmail with qmail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:00:46 -0000 In message: <200306261913.h5QJDIig001490@grimreaper.grondar.org> Mark Murray writes: : Alin-Adrian Anton writes: : > Hi guys, : > : > As sendmail showed to be so vulnerable in the past, and even in the : > recent past, I was wondering to propose removing it from the default : > install on freebsd. Currently, sendmail comes with the system sources, : > and runs as root. I think this is bad, and it could be replaced with : > qmail, for example. Or, something else, if you think something else is : > more secure. Please let me know if this is possible, or why if not, and : > to whom shall I address this idea (I wonder why it didn't happen yet). : : Please look for this topic in the archives. It has been discussed : VERY many times. Also, we can't use qmail because its license is not compatible with the project's needs. There are lots of other issues using an alternative mailer, and Mark is right. It has been done to death. Warner