From owner-freebsd-bugs  Thu Sep  7 12:11: 6 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3CE37B422
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  7 Sep 2000 12:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zeppo.feral.com (IDENT:mjacob@zeppo [192.67.166.71])
	by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA29675;
	Thu, 7 Sep 2000 12:11:03 -0700
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 12:07:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
To: Jin Guojun <jin@george.lbl.gov>
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bin/21093: New option for restore (patch)
In-Reply-To: <200009071910.e87JAHC25955@portnoy.lbl.gov>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009071207000.14124-100000@zeppo.feral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


> > But, especially for dump (which should Die! Die! Die!), ...
> 
> I have heard this before, but forgot what will be the replacement for dump?
> Any one knows what is a better back-up mechanism?

I'm working on an NDMP implementation which will be the network transport
portion of it.
-matt




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message