From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 20 09:37:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7137C16A403 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:37:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp3.clear.net.nz (smtp3.clear.net.nz [203.97.33.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6AC43C9F for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:37:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (121-72-71-65.dsl.telstraclear.net [121.72.71.65]) by smtp3.clear.net.nz (CLEAR Net Mail) with ESMTP id <0JAK00M1UG2Q6D40@smtp3.clear.net.nz> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:37:39 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 22:37:32 +1300 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <200612200618.12826.joao@matik.com.br> To: JoaoBR Message-id: <4589045C.1050206@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <45888C68.10305@paradise.net.nz> <200612200618.12826.joao@matik.com.br> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (X11/20061129) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cached file read performance with 6.2-PRERELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 09:37:41 -0000 JoaoBR wrote: > On Tuesday 19 December 2006 22:05, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> $ dd of=/dev/null if=/tmp/file bs=32k # read it >> 819200000 bytes transferred in 1.801944 secs (454620117 bytes/sec) >> > > > hum, look my releng_6: > # dd of=/dev/null if=/c/c1/file bs=32k > 819200000 bytes transferred in 0.896507 secs (913768635 bytes/sec) > Hmm - so your machine reads memory twice as fast as mine, which is great! but I'm not sure it actually shows anything useful ... let me guess - a P4 with DDR or DDR2 memory??? maybe if we look a bit harder at buffer cache performance you could get 1.2GB/s or more - wouldn't that be a good thing? Cheers Mark