From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 21 17:42:30 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF82106566B
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:42:30 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru
	[46.4.40.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45D0C8FC18
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:42:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown
	[IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:8870:d54b:33e8:55b2])
	(Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
	by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B31A54AC2D; 
	Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:42:28 +0400 (MSK)
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 21:42:25 +0400
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-ID: <686419050.20120821214225@serebryakov.spb.ru>
To: Ian Lepore <freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org>
In-Reply-To: <1345570590.27688.367.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
References: <20120821095527.GA33206@hell.ukr.net>
	<67977762.20120821154035@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<1959717636.20120821155308@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<201208210934.31484.jhb@freebsd.org>
	<1049151425.20120821190433@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<1345562163.27688.347.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
	<709115163.20120821192652@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<1345564507.27688.354.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
	<1409150425.20120821210152@serebryakov.spb.ru>
	<1345570590.27688.367.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: r239356: does it mean,
	that synchronous dhcp and dhcplcinet with disabled devd gone?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:42:30 -0000

Hello, Ian.
You wrote 21 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3=D1=83=D1=81=D1=82=D0=B0 2012 =D0=B3., 21:36=
:30:

IL> I think it's funny how people have this knee-jerk reaction against C++
IL> apps.  The devd executable is not exactly an example of bloatware: 374k
IL> statically linked (so it already includes this "C++ runtime" that you
IL> think is large).    We routinely deploy embedded systems that use apps
IL> written exclusively in C++, on systems that only have 32 or 64mb of ram.
IL> We've been doing so since the days when the biggest compact flash card
IL> you could buy was 64mb.
  BTW, typical  MIPS  SoC-based  router has only 16MiB of flash. And,
 yes, FreeBSD doesn't fit well in this size now, but why add another
 mandatory program, only role of which is to monitor network cable and
 re-run the same program every time?

--=20
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>