From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Mon Oct 7 03:07:57 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC36613BD03; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 03:07:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from symbion.zaytman.com (symbion.zaytman.com [64.112.176.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "symbion", Issuer "Narawntapu" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46mllw37Svz499f; Mon, 7 Oct 2019 03:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from narawntapu.narawntapu (pool-108-5-48-210.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [108.5.48.210]) by symbion.zaytman.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9737n0s088282 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 6 Oct 2019 23:07:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: symbion.zaytman.com: Host pool-108-5-48-210.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [108.5.48.210] claimed to be narawntapu.narawntapu Received: from aldan.narawntapu (aldan [192.168.3.13]) by narawntapu.narawntapu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9737gqd073353; Sun, 6 Oct 2019 23:07:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: narawntapu.narawntapu: Host aldan [192.168.3.13] claimed to be aldan.narawntapu Subject: Re: svn commit: r513679 - head/sysutils/fusefs-smbnetfs/files To: Tobias Kortkamp , Gleb Popov Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201910031745.x93Hje5x059120@repo.freebsd.org> <20191006054444.GB62549@urd.tobik.me> <20191006081114.GA33887@urd.tobik.me> From: "Mikhail T." Message-ID: Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 23:07:42 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191006081114.GA33887@urd.tobik.me> Content-Language: en-US X-DCC-uptempo.net-Metrics: narawntapu 1093; bulk rep Body=5 Fuz1=5 Fuz2=5 rep=49% X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.2 required=19.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE,RATWR8_MESSID,TW_SV,WINDOWS_7BITS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on narawntapu.narawntapu X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46mllw37Svz499f X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mi@aldan.algebra.com has no SPF policy when checking 64.112.176.10) smtp.mailfrom=mi@aldan.algebra.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.77 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.01)[country: US(-0.05)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[algebra.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.96)[0.962,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.91)[0.914,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:394548, ipnet:64.112.176.0/24, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[thun]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[210.48.5.108.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2019 03:07:57 -0000 On 06.10.19 04:11, Tobias Kortkamp wrote: > We do not have options specific PORTREVISIONs and there are more > package repositories than pkg.FreeBSD.org. If you have previously > built your packages with LIBSECRET=on, the applied fix will change the > package in a non-trivial way. However since PORTREVISION was not > bumped Poudriere or other package builders will not rebuild the > package. Bascially people will have to micromanage/force the rebuild > fusefs-smbnetfs if they want this fix. fusefs-smbnetfs is hardly an > expensive package to build so saving rebuilds at the cost of wasting > people's time is not worth it and bad UX. What I'm trying to avoid is the opposite -- thousands of package-builders, tens of thousands of users, rebuilding their fusefs-smbnetfs for no reason whatsoever. /That/ is bad user experience... Considering, that no one has contacted me about adding this particular patch -- despite it being available on SourceForge for months -- I suspect rather strongly, that it simply is not used with LIBSECRET by anyone... Or, if a few people are actually building it with the option turned on, that's a deliberate action and they are not trying to disable the feature through configuration -- which disabling is now fixed by the new patch. Yours, -mi