From owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Feb  3 18:33:27 2007
Return-Path: <owner-ctm-users@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: ctm-users@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4941416A400
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2007 18:33:27 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net)
Received: from thin.berklix.org (thin.berklix.org [194.246.123.68])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D023F13C441
	for <ctm-users@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2007 18:33:26 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net)
Received: from js.berklix.net (p549A65A4.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.101.164])
	(authenticated bits=128)
	by thin.berklix.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l13IWxrK022530;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:33:01 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net)
Received: from fire.jhs.private (fire.jhs.private [192.168.91.41])
	by js.berklix.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l13IWwxs024077;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:32:59 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from jhs@flat.berklix.net)
Received: from fire.jhs.private (localhost.jhs.private [127.0.0.1])
	by fire.jhs.private (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l13IWw8R096457;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2007 19:32:58 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from jhs@fire.jhs.private)
Message-Id: <200702031832.l13IWw8R096457@fire.jhs.private>
To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com>
In-reply-to: <20070203174535.GA68904@misty.eyesbeyond.com> 
References: <45C35E40.8090009@math.missouri.edu>
	<200702031652.l13GqNdZ094789@fire.jhs.private>
	<20070203174535.GA68904@misty.eyesbeyond.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com>
	message dated "Sat, 03 Feb 2007 09:45:35 -0800."
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 19:32:58 +0100
From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@flat.berklix.net>
Cc: ctm-users@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: src-4 
X-BeenThere: ctm-users@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CTM User discussions <ctm-users.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/ctm-users>
List-Post: <mailto:ctm-users@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/ctm-users>,
	<mailto:ctm-users-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 18:33:27 -0000

> RELENG_4 branch.  Now, while I wouldn't rule out the occasional stray
> commit, I would say that RELENG_4 is pretty much dead.  

The aggregate of stray commits to RELENG_4 will do no good to ctm
users if ctm-4 is not there, just CVSup users will benefit.  BSD
gets business credibility by stability & not rushing to judgement.
Individuals who do not want ctm-src-4 should unsubscribe it, but
not attempt to deny ctm-src-4 to others.  When diminishing src-4
list no longer warrants Stephen's space & bandwidth he'll know &
tell us.

-- 
Julian Stacey.  BSD Unix C Net Consultancy, Munich/Muenchen  http://berklix.com
Mail Ascii, not HTML.		Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.
Vista of a Bill from Redmond ?  http://berklix.com/free-talk-on-free-software/