Date: Tue, 2 Apr 1996 22:16:47 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD hackers) Cc: ponds!rivers@dg-rtp.dg.com (Thomas David Rivers) Subject: Re: 2.1-RELEASE vs. 2.1-STABLE. Message-ID: <199604022016.WAA11563@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199604021333.IAA09791@lakes> from "Thomas David Rivers" at Apr 2, 96 08:33:13 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Thomas David Rivers wrote: > Since I'm a lonely, ol' UUCP site - is there a set of diff's > between RELEASE and STABLE to bring a 2.1-RELEASE source tree Hmm, -stable is rather a moving target, and despite of its name, said to be not that stable as all... > up to 2.1-STABLE. Is there a CVS log somewhere that shows > the difference between these two named versions? CVS log: yes. 100-line summary: no. I don't know if it would be a good idea to automagically generate CVS diffs between RELENG_2_1_0_RELEASE and RELENG_2_1_0 (that are the tags by name), and drop this diff somewhere onto freefall... -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604022016.WAA11563>