From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Feb 18 9:23:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (s205m64.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AB0117AE for ; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 09:23:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id JAA15403; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 09:21:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dhw) Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 09:21:09 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199902181721.JAA15403@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: dhw@whistle.com, girgen@partitur.se Subject: Re: KDE status w/ 3.1-R? Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <36CB7939.7A7A1B63@partitur.se> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 03:21:45 +0100 >From: Palle Girgensohn >I have seen this error, but unfortunatley I cannot remember what the >problem is... :-} Life's like that, sometimes.... >However, I have a working set of kde & 3.1 here, and here's what I did: >Do not use -O2 with the FreeBSD gcc (not sure this applies here...). I >use egcs-1.1.1 (from ports/lang/egcs) to compile most ports, and it >works great. You must compile kde and qt with the same compiler, >though... Ummm.... That sounds rather more involved than what I would expect.... After the clean install of 3.1-R, I did a bit of tweaking to make it "play nice" on our local network. I did *not* change any make-related configuration files, and KDE was the first "port" I tried to build. I'm using as "vanilla" an installation as I can get by with. (I administer several machines; extensively customizing each one is not something for which I have time.) >use kde11 instead of kde. It is newer, and works better. It is stable >and released now, not beta. Hmmm.... OK; I'll try that. I've never used either one (and have no incentive to do so; I use tvtwm as a window manager), so I have no pre-suppositions as to what any expected mode of operation might be for KDE. (Well, I've used CDE on the SPARCstation at home, but for other reasons, I switched to olvwm there.) >here's an excerpt from my make.conf: >CFLAGS= -O -pipe >CC= /usr/local/bin/gcc >CXX= /usr/local/bin/g++ >While this does not answer your questions, I hope it might help anyway. OK; thanks.... (Is it expected that folks would need to modify this in order to build a "port"?) >Oh, by the way, the clean up process is just fine, it the way it works. >It goes through all dependencies and clean them up recursively. Since >many x11 ports depends on XFree86, it gets cleaned a lot... It just didn't seem to show any sign of self-terminating; I only showed a small excerpt from what it did. Thanks, david -- David Wolfskill UNIX System Administrator dhw@whistle.com voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (650) 371-4621 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message