From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 09:30:53 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A260106566B; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9A98FC16; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:30:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id p369UpjY074572; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:30:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p369Uo48074571; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:30:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:30:50 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: Martin Matuska Message-ID: <20110406093050.GN50351@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20110319152838.GA8594@alchemy.franken.de> <20110321175632.GA19345@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> <20110321175933.GD2086@garage.freebsd.pl> <20110322191117.GH15528@alchemy.franken.de> <20110325155735.GG82490@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> <20110326143109.GU15528@alchemy.franken.de> <4D8FBEDE.8060100@FreeBSD.org> <20110328141922.GE1961@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> <4D9C1E26.1020802@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D9C1E26.1020802@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Roger Hammerstein , pjd@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sparc64 hang with zfs v28 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:30:53 -0000 On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 10:02:46AM +0200, Martin Matuska wrote: > Starting April, 9th I will be on a vacation for 3 weeks > and by now I had not much time/opportunities to completely fix this > problem for sparc64 (one of my biggest problems is lack of testing). > > We have two options: > - submit my patch now and competely fix the problem later > - somebody else with testing capabilities takes a look at it and fixes > the last part As I said earlier it would be great to get the existing fixes into the tree ASAP in order to get ZFS into a state one can work with on !x86 again (as nwhitehorn@ reported the missing copy{in,out}(9) at least also affects powerpc64 and likely also all other !x86 archs, in case somebody cares). I'm rather at a loss regarding the remaining compatibility problem as this is too deep in the ZFS land for me. It would be great if you could wait with MFC'ing ZFS v28 until this is completely fixed though. Regarding testing I'd suspect Michael to be more than willing to try patches. Marius