From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Apr 14 16:15:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA22463 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 16:15:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA22457 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 16:15:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.mt.sri.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id RAA26926; Mon, 14 Apr 1997 17:11:19 -0600 (MDT) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 1997 17:11:19 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199704142311.RAA26926@rocky.mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Terry Lambert Cc: abelits@phobos.illtel.denver.co.us, jbryant@tfs.net, dennis@etinc.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Commercial vendors registry In-Reply-To: <199704142142.OAA19460@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199704142142.OAA19460@phaeton.artisoft.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.26 under 19.15 XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Linux is more available for users, and a lot of its users have no > > clue, how to use it. > > Ugh. I take exception here. It sounds like you are claiming Linux > users mostly come from installations of CDROM's from bookstores, instead > of from the net. Net availability is equal, if different. Actually, I'd agree with that statement. *MOST* Linux users install from CDROMS. If it weren't that way I'd argue that Linux would not be as popular as it is, since their network installations are just recently as easy as the FreeBSD installation. They essentially copies the FreeBSD install to do network installations. Nate