From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 30 17:27:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59E9237B401 for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 17:27:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp-relay.omnis.com (smtp-relay.omnis.com [216.239.128.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7AD43F3F for ; Fri, 30 May 2003 17:27:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from salty.rapid.stbernard.com (corp-2.ipinc.com [199.245.188.2]) by smtp-relay.omnis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BE231BB39; Fri, 30 May 2003 17:27:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr.com To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav , Bruce M Simpson Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 17:27:06 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20030528231134.GE23471@spc.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200305301727.06623.wes@softweyr.com> cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: gcc bug? Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 00:27:09 -0000 On Thursday 29 May 2003 00:12, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Bruce M Simpson writes: > > However, we're dealing with something a bit more stable in terms of > > code base, anyway. Having to commit a whole bunch of fixes for the > > sake of a compiler upgrade isn't acceptable. Sounds like the GCC > > guys have been bitten by the Linux bug. > > May I remind you that K&R-style declarations have been deprecated for > the last 14 years? Funny, the last time I looked at a C language specification they were still supported. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters wes@softweyr.com