From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Dec  1 11:56:38 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from cs.rice.edu (cs.rice.edu [128.42.1.30])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0955E37B400; Fri,  1 Dec 2000 11:56:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from alc@localhost)
	by cs.rice.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) id NAA08944;
	Fri, 1 Dec 2000 13:56:34 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 13:56:34 -0600
From: Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: alc@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: why doesn't aio use at_exit(9)?
Message-ID: <20001201135634.D26574@cs.rice.edu>
References: <20001201020257.R8051@fw.wintelcom.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5us
In-Reply-To: <20001201020257.R8051@fw.wintelcom.net>; from Alfred Perlstein on Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:02:58AM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 02:02:58AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> why doesn't aio use at_exit(9) instead of requiring an explicit
> call in kern_exit.c for aio_rundown?
> 

There's no reason that I'm aware of.  Unless you're in a hurry,
I'll add that change to a cleanup patch that I have in the pipe.

Alan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message