From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Jun 18 21: 8:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from munkboxen.mine.nu (213-152-51-194.dsl.eclipse.net.uk [213.152.51.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAE737B40D for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2002 21:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from munk@localhost) by munkboxen.mine.nu (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g5J46Tf07758 for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 19 Jun 2002 05:06:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from munk) Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 05:06:29 +0100 From: Jez Hancock To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bandwidth billing and measurement scripts Message-ID: <20020619050629.A7749@munkboxen.mine.nu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020619000227.A5671@munkboxen.mine.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from artem@mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua on Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 07:02:09AM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 07:02:09AM +0300, Artyom V. Viklenko wrote: > There is no possibility for ipfw to understood name-based virtual hosting! > It is in a different (application) layer, while ipfw work > solely with ip pakets - network layer. > > To monitor usage of my web servers I use webaliser. Each virtual web > server logs its activity in separate files and then webaliser can > process tem. Cheers Artyom... just curious, had thought that was the case, just after verification. -- Nobody ever got fired for choosing Microsoft, but Nobody ever looked stupid for choosing FreeBSD... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message