Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 00:01:25 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> To: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, Jason Unovitch <junovitch@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r416439 - head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs Message-ID: <d4a6997a-b5ae-f368-5843-cb0f7596c223@mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <h927-iydv-wny@FreeBSD.org> References: <201704012020.v31KKM24033490@slippy.cwsent.com> <02a45cdf-904b-1306-5d93-4dcc82f39cea@mat.cc> <h927-iydv-wny@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Le 01/04/2017 =C3=A0 23:58, Jan Beich a =C3=A9crit : > Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> writes: > >> Le 01/04/2017 =C3=A0 22:20, Cy Schubert a =C3=A9crit : >> >>> In message <201606052250.u55Mo44E016592@repo.freebsd.org>, Jason Unov= itch=20 >>> write >>> s: >>>> Author: junovitch >>>> Date: Sun Jun 5 22:50:04 2016 >>>> New Revision: 416439 >>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416439 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: pass MAINTAINER to submitter >>>> =20 >>>> PR: 209976 >>>> Submitted by: Du=C3=85=C2=A1an Vejnovi=C3=84=C2=8D <freebsd@dussan= .org> >>> Is there a reason we grant maintainer on a simple maintainer request?= It=20 >>> used to be that a MAINTAINER was given maintainership only when a pat= ch was=20 >>> submitted not a patch to just change MAINTAINER. Has this policy chan= ged? >> The policy has not changed, those commits should not happen, but, well= , >> they do. > Where is this policy documented? I'm sure I've made the same mistake > more than once in the past. I'm not sure it penciled down, we try to not commit only maintainer changes, but require patches that actually update the port. --=20 Mathieu Arnold
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?d4a6997a-b5ae-f368-5843-cb0f7596c223>