From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Sat Apr 1 22:01:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7029CD28F49; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 22:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32DA5A4B; Sat, 1 Apr 2017 22:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@mat.cc) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F47BDCBE; Sun, 2 Apr 2017 00:01:26 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=mat.cc; h=subject:to :references:cc:from:message-id:date:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=plouf; bh=/8DVpebu4r7 bIBamW0+tQKhLsW8=; b=YpjNYighOHZk6lmtPyCIo3j5dtUN8cB8OCUVnZ0jAY2 Hm/+XJSXs7mqRhsXIDCbcQtDn4MVKkdq/JbZvW3wGbijvBEo9K5GmvkwgNP7t9Zr qlfiZCiqCmjPg/n7f+anwM/ClCYlVejC99pw/s0R3caIKq0VCuAiVHAoR0vCWQKE = Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1B89BDCB6; Sun, 2 Apr 2017 00:01:26 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r416439 - head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs To: Jan Beich References: <201704012020.v31KKM24033490@slippy.cwsent.com> <02a45cdf-904b-1306-5d93-4dcc82f39cea@mat.cc> Cc: Cy Schubert , Jason Unovitch , svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org From: Mathieu Arnold Message-ID: Date: Sun, 2 Apr 2017 00:01:25 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 22:01:30 -0000 Le 01/04/2017 =C3=A0 23:58, Jan Beich a =C3=A9crit : > Mathieu Arnold writes: > >> Le 01/04/2017 =C3=A0 22:20, Cy Schubert a =C3=A9crit : >> >>> In message <201606052250.u55Mo44E016592@repo.freebsd.org>, Jason Unov= itch=20 >>> write >>> s: >>>> Author: junovitch >>>> Date: Sun Jun 5 22:50:04 2016 >>>> New Revision: 416439 >>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416439 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: pass MAINTAINER to submitter >>>> =20 >>>> PR: 209976 >>>> Submitted by: Du=C3=85=C2=A1an Vejnovi=C3=84=C2=8D >>> Is there a reason we grant maintainer on a simple maintainer request?= It=20 >>> used to be that a MAINTAINER was given maintainership only when a pat= ch was=20 >>> submitted not a patch to just change MAINTAINER. Has this policy chan= ged? >> The policy has not changed, those commits should not happen, but, well= , >> they do. > Where is this policy documented? I'm sure I've made the same mistake > more than once in the past. I'm not sure it penciled down, we try to not commit only maintainer changes, but require patches that actually update the port. --=20 Mathieu Arnold