Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 14:32:52 -0600 From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> To: will andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem on making kdevelop 1.0beta4.1 Message-ID: <19991201143252.L79505@lovett.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.991130142958.andrews@technologist.com>; from andrews@technologist.com on Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 02:29:58PM -0500 References: <99112813355301.04840@mlobo.nlink.com.br> <XFMail.991130142958.andrews@technologist.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999 at 02:29:58PM -0500, will andrews wrote: > > [snip] > > 1) The kdelibs11 and qt142 ports are not set to use the newer g++ by > default. They need the USE_NEWGCC switch first. And there is nothing > I can do about these problems, since I am not the maintainer of > either of these ports. > > [snip] > > If you want any kind of kdevelop port committed to the ports tree for FreeBSD, > you will need to bug the following: > > 1) Maintainer of kdelibs11 port <se@FreeBSD.ORG> > 2) Maintainer of Qt 1.42 port <andreas@FreeBSD.ORG> Out of curiosity, has anyone contacted either Stefan or Andreas to get the necessary changes made? Alternatively (and this is addressed more to the committers that read -ports), if I or someone else come up with a set of patches to both qt142 and kde*11 that: (a) use USE_NEWGCC (b) bump the shared library version numbers so that it's obvious that (a) has happened. would they get committed -- ideally before a ports freeze for 3.4R -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19991201143252.L79505>