From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 4 15:01:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E2BF78F for ; Mon, 4 May 2015 15:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (thyme.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED41019CF for ; Mon, 4 May 2015 15:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 346E337B593; Mon, 4 May 2015 10:01:42 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3lgS7n4xSRz210; Mon, 4 May 2015 10:01:41 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 4 May 2015 10:01:41 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Fabian Keil Cc: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Pass TRIM through GELI Message-ID: <20150504150141.GV78376@over-yonder.net> References: <20150308000131.GP1742@over-yonder.net> <20150324021924.GQ52331@over-yonder.net> <20150502125220.GS78376@over-yonder.net> <4ea2ed80.2a96d87b@fabiankeil.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ea2ed80.2a96d87b@fabiankeil.de> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23-fullermd.4 (2014-03-12) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 15:01:50 -0000 On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 03:25:30PM +0200 I heard the voice of Fabian Keil, and lo! it spake thus: > > One minor issue I ran into is that a patched kernel will reject > onetime requests from an unpatched userland: > [...] > The culprit is: Interesting. Sounds reasonable enough. Should probably pull out the 'detach' handling similarly... -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream.