From owner-freebsd-net Tue Oct 13 21:06:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA01220 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 21:06:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from sierrahill.com (sierrahill.com [216.30.23.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA01191 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 21:06:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rjoe@sierrahill.com) Received: (from rjoe@localhost) by sierrahill.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA13379 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 13 Oct 1998 23:04:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjoe) From: Joe Schwartz Message-Id: <199810140404.XAA13379@sierrahill.com> Subject: imap vs pop3 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 23:04:11 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Folks, As a new ISP, I'd appreciate your comments on the IMAP from the packages selection. Is it stable & mature? What testing I've done (Netscape on NT wkstn configured to use IMAP with FreeBSD 2.2.5) doen't refresh Netscape's list of mail without restarting it after sending a test message to myself and then expecting to see it update Netscape's top scroll list of mail on the IMAP server. Thanks, Joe Schwartz PS I'm using Qualcomm's pop3. Any other one I should consider replacing it with? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message