From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Apr 26 07:17:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id HAA23343 for isp-outgoing; Sat, 26 Apr 1997 07:17:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tok.qiv.com ([204.214.141.211]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id HAA23337 for ; Sat, 26 Apr 1997 07:17:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by tok.qiv.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with UUCP id JAA22901; Sat, 26 Apr 1997 09:17:24 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (jdn@localhost) by acp.qiv.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA00251; Sat, 26 Apr 1997 09:09:20 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: acp.qiv.com: jdn owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 09:09:19 -0500 (CDT) From: "Jay D. Nelson" To: Steve cc: spork , Bill Grunfelder , freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SMTP gateway clients In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I may be too dense, but I don't understand what `dial up' SMTP gains over UUCP -- except the added IP overhead. Am I missing something or does your customer just have a burr under the blanket? -- Jay On Sat, 26 Apr 1997, Steve wrote: ->On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, spork wrote: -> ->> I remember we hacked it with two by having one default through the ->> other... It worked, but the one acting as the gateway for the other was ->> not very happy... ->> ->> Please post your solution, as Annexes amuse me to no end. They are such ->> evil little boxes. I've also heard (not a routing expert) that RIP v2 ->> updates on any change, which would solve the problem assuming the Annex ->> can do v2... -> ->They do rip2, but it doesnt apparently work. One person sent me a ->possible solution. Using 1 class C for the annex ethernet cards, and the ->static IPs so that the ethernet cards would proxy arp them. Then another ->class C for the dynamic ones assigned to modems, then static routes in ->ones cisco to assist the world in finding the non-statics. -> ->I think I will tell the 1 or 2 people who want smtp to buy uucp or hike. -> ->> ->> Charles ->> ->> On Fri, 25 Apr 1997, Bill Grunfelder wrote: ->> ->> > How many RA4000s do you have? I have a solution (albeit an ugly one, but it ->> > works) if you've only got 2 of them, and a cisco router (not sure if it will ->> > work with others). ->> > ->> > ->> > Bill ->> > ....................................................................... ->> > Bill Grunfelder System Administrator ->> > wjgrun@cyberwar.com Cyber Warrior, Inc. ->> > http://www.cyberwar.com/~wjgrun/ (201) 703-1517 ->> > ->> > -The above does not necessarily coincide with the views of my employer- ->> > ->> ->> ->