From owner-cvs-all Wed Oct 27 20: 6:22 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4144B14CAD; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 20:06:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from semuta.feral.com (semuta [192.67.166.70]) by feral.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA18419; Wed, 27 Oct 1999 20:05:51 -0700 Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 20:05:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Bill Fumerola Cc: Matt Jacob , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/isp isp.c In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > On Wed, 27 Oct 1999, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > Hmm? Not following you on this one here... > > > > Look- I agree that things should not just immediately get punted from > > -current into -stable- but this was an obvious problem to fix. If I don't > > do an immediate MFC on the obvious ones, things get out of sync very > > rapidly, and it becomes impossible to maintain the 3 different FreeBSD > > release streams, NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux streams, and this is just the > > OSS platforms I'm working on.... > > > > If there's another way to do this that guarantees a coherent bug fix > > across all the streams, I'd be glad to head abou it. > > Okay, I thought I had just seen a commit that enabled and then later a > commit that disabled the same thing. Still would like to know if there is an easier way to do this.... :-) Due diligence is wearing me out... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message