From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 15 09:30:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E453D982 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C992267 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7F9U1fC068286 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r7F9U1wL068285; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:30:01 GMT Message-Id: <201308150930.r7F9U1wL068285@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Jonathan Chen Subject: Re: ports/181124: java/eclipse-devel broken after glib-2.36.3 update X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jonathan Chen List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 09:30:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/181124; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jonathan Chen To: George Neville-Neil Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, "eclipse@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: ports/181124: java/eclipse-devel broken after glib-2.36.3 update Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 21:20:19 +1200 On 13 August 2013 14:01, George Neville-Neil wrote: > I have tested the patch on HEAD and it indeed fixes the problem with eclipse-devel. > > I can commit the patch, but I do not know how it will effect other systems, i.e. 9.0 or 8.x > sets. Comments anyone? Thanks for the commit. Can you please close the PR as well? Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen