From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Apr 22 14:06:51 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA04542
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 14:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dilbert.bb.cc.wa.us ([208.8.136.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA04535
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 14:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from chris@localhost) by dilbert.bb.cc.wa.us (8.8.3/8.8.3) id OAA10254; Tue, 22 Apr 1997 14:05:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 14:04:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Chris Coleman <chris@dilbert.bb.cc.wa.us>
To: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IPFILTER  
In-Reply-To: <199701141257.MAA00330@mail.bb.cc.wa.us>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970422135817.10245B-100000@dilbert.bb.cc.wa.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I am running IPNAT and
Currently i have this as the only rule in my rule set, so everyone comes 
back as the same person from the DNS. 

map fxp0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 208.8.136.10/32 portmap tcp/udp 10000:65000

I would like to split up the domain in to 5 sections (according to 
buildings) and map all the buildings separately to different ip addresses.  
And have the last rule catch all of the other connections and run them 
through current ip address.

I tried to do this, but couldn;t figure out how to make a rule to "catch 
all" of the remaining ones.  Do rules have precedence?  what if i just 
want to map one ip address to a specific ip address and catch all the 
rest through the normal rules?

I am sure i am missing something.

--Thanks