Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 2 Jun 2003 20:45:58 +0200
From:      "Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]" <Danovitsch@Vitsch.net>
To:        Gary Aitken <freebsd@dreamchaser.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ipfw final rule
Message-ID:  <200306022045.58095.Danovitsch@Vitsch.net>
In-Reply-To: <3EDB7503.2070403@dreamchaser.org>
References:  <20030531000201.26C2C37B404@hub.freebsd.org> <3EDB7503.2070403@dreamchaser.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 02 June 2003 18:02, Gary Aitken wrote:
>    I was considering turning on bridging, which requires the final ipfw
>    rule to be allow, not deny.
>    So I added a deny rule at 65534, but temporarily left the default de=
ny
>    rule in place in the kernel.
>
>    Interestingly, my log shows the following:
> > 65534   582   58547 deny ip from any to any
> > 65535     3     234 deny ip from any to any
>
> This looks like an impossible situation, since the last 3 should have b=
een
> caug ht by the previous rule.
I think they got caught in the split second between the time of flushing =
out=20
all rules and loading a new ruleset.
At that time 65535 was the only rule in the ruleset and 3 packets must ha=
ve=20
reached your machine...

grtz,
Daan



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200306022045.58095.Danovitsch>