From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 21 18:44:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F051065673 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (lev.vlakno.cz [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4848FC17 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47299CB099; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:42:14 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5GulOYZTSvwn; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:42:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7959B9CB0E4; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:42:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o3LIgCxK002655; Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:42:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:42:12 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Dimitry Andric Message-ID: <20100421184212.GA2567@freebsd.org> References: <20100416160818.GA69460@freebsd.org> <4BC9E9D2.1040505@andric.com> <20100421182022.GA99224@freebsd.org> <4BCF45D6.20401@andric.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <4BCF45D6.20401@andric.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT]: ClangBSD is selfhosting, we need testers now X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 18:44:39 -0000 On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 08:37:10PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2010-04-21 20:20, Roman Divacky wrote: > >>=1B[1m/home/dim/src/clangbsd/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/unwind= .inc:140:1: =1B[0m=1B[0;1;35mwarning: =1B[0m=1B[1mcontrol may reach end of = non-void function [-Wreturn-type] > >>=1B[0m} > >>=1B[0;1;32m^ > >>=1B[0m=1B[1m/home/dim/src/clangbsd/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/= unwind.inc:216:1: =1B[0m=1B[0;1;35mwarning: =1B[0m=1B[1mcontrol may reach e= nd of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] > >>=1B[0m} > >>=1B[0;1;32m^ > >>=1B[0m=1B[1m/home/dim/src/clangbsd/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/= unwind.inc:266:1: =1B[0m=1B[0;1;35mwarning: =1B[0m=1B[1mcontrol may reach e= nd of non-void function [-Wreturn-type] > >>=1B[0m} > >>=1B[0;1;32m^ > >>=1B[0m'486' is not a recognized processor for this target (ignoring=20 > >>processor) > > > >what happens when you dont set CPUTYPE? >=20 > I didn't set it. :) Contents of /etc/make.conf is: heh... thats a typo. anyway, I guess I'll need to check this on real i386 to see whats going on.. thnx for the report, I'll get back