From owner-svn-src-stable-9@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 1 11:27:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ACD1500; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:27:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 160B3BDA; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 11:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (pool-173-70-85-244.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net [173.70.85.244]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B43CB987; Sat, 1 Jun 2013 07:27:54 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Navdeep Parhar Subject: Re: svn commit: r251191 - in stable/9/sys: conf x86/acpica Date: Sat, 1 Jun 2013 07:26:40 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-STABLE; KDE/4.8.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201305311913.r4VJDNCx025746@svn.freebsd.org> <51A8F7EF.8030804@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <51A8F7EF.8030804@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201306010726.41079.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Sat, 01 Jun 2013 07:27:54 -0400 (EDT) Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable-9@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for only the 9-stable src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 Jun 2013 11:27:56 -0000 On Friday, May 31, 2013 03:20:15 PM Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On 05/31/13 12:13, John Baldwin wrote: > > Author: jhb > > Date: Fri May 31 19:13:22 2013 > > New Revision: 251191 > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/251191 > > > > Log: > > MFC 246805: > > Make VM_NDOMAIN a kernel option so that it can be enabled from a kernel > > config file. > > Is this going to live long in 9? Or will be replaced with MAXMEMDOM > like it was in head? I do not expect the NUMA changes in 10 to be merged to 9. We could perhaps rename the option here to match, though they have different semantics (the old stuff is first-touch rather than round-robin). There are actually folks using the older stuff in production it turns out (not just my employer), so having it as an option still makes sense I think. If avoiding a future name change seems more important then I'm fine with merging the name change. -- John Baldwin