Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Feb 2024 09:02:57 -0800
From:      Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
To:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Toolchain <freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Should https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg-fallout/ (and related) get reports of broken status?
Message-ID:  <E7445EE1-45BC-4BAB-999E-13730A2EAB79@yahoo.com>
References:  <E7445EE1-45BC-4BAB-999E-13730A2EAB79.ref@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In using the likes of:

=
https://portsfallout.com/fallout?port=3Dscience%2Frdkit&maintainer=3D&env=3D=
&category=3D&flavor=3D

it is not obvious that the most recent date being
2023-12-15 20:13 for a filed "build" is because
the port was marked broken before the next builds
were attempted: I can not infer that the packages
are being built.

I had been checking if the port was still not
building. If there was a category named, say,
"broken" that would have been obvious as later
build attempts would have been shown as having
been marked as broken.

As stands, it was a separate research project
to discover that no builds were completing with
a built package (the thing of interest).

(portsfallout.com use is just one example way of
using the fallout logs. The question is more
general.)

=3D=3D=3D
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E7445EE1-45BC-4BAB-999E-13730A2EAB79>