From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 17:47:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80ED3106566C for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:47:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us) Received: from outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-01.bluehost.com [69.89.21.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4777C8FC18 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 17:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20976 invoked by uid 0); 2 Mar 2010 17:47:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box264.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.64) by cpoproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2010 17:47:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=joseph-a-nagy-jr.us; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:X-Identified-User; b=e0djs7Be4ZFzIlG6TnXi6eVsKclyO/LkFchpthskSFDKzSQeDqcllxUi8shM0DDnt7KKNFla8kadtA82H75OPNOyzbCPEeGydsOke2/W7v7bSTkvEJWurdHP8LHZLJ3m; Received: from [206.74.86.236] (helo=[192.168.1.102]) by box264.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmWBc-0001GS-91 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 10:47:12 -0700 Message-ID: <4B8D4F15.701@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:47:01 -0600 From: Programmer In Training User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100203 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4B8BF6E3.3040009@telting.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6A1FF59D986118BA8C5F68E4" X-Identified-User: {2250:box264.bluehost.com:ameliora:joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} {sentby:smtp auth 206.74.86.236 authed with pit@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us} Subject: Re: spreculative: /bin2 & /usr/bin2 and alternative package/ports trees? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 17:47:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6A1FF59D986118BA8C5F68E4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/02/10 11:35, Chris Rees wrote: > Why does it make a difference with the prefix on where you put them? > You shouldn't manually delete ports, anyway. You should deinstall them > using the port... >=20 > Chris I think he's talking about how with Debian and apt you can specify different repositories to install from without messing up the base system. My problem with that is that dependency resolution quickly breaks if you have one of the repositories out of sync with the others. --=20 Yours In Christ, PIT Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content copyright under the OWL http://owl.apotheon.org Please do not CC me. If I'm posting to a list it is because I am subscrib= ed. --------------enig6A1FF59D986118BA8C5F68E4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLjU8bAAoJEENZQ8DH7rW056QH/1+jFAYmS4WMFou5/zAk/JzT Y3k2oI4o9Bfck+B/GJYZOay5YKgpd+PUGu9MyfEWSJCMyrCmuuRZ2oKMAXy2nNUA k1tmd/GY2cny4WD+GoNdzdTbO7cl0hHzQoG4ZsUIIpz5Pfm9Sr3B/y8vtJzKacll +rmmNBOXvX6Yjl8pYU9gnckdkK9MtIf3aGu65/n7Gt6f6uB11//+mbXr6R5nvXz/ eC3SFiZ7yqtPUrTGS9GC6naoDdDLHiHwPrC6rZ9NgO2zILChth0VZ+l5oNuB06mZ 4JD6UfcTT6+hf5XUCe00BKrdW0K49WYmGMw1uxt0gl7ZsvzhUt9TEqbkHXEaHsk= =wheb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6A1FF59D986118BA8C5F68E4--