Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2000 15:07:49 -0800 (PST) From: Darren Pilgrim <dmp@aracnet.com> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, A G F Keahan <ak@freenet.co.uk>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Optimal UFS parameters Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012071319240.11097-100000@shell1.aracnet.com> In-Reply-To: <200012072056.eB7Ku3112378@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a interesting topic (to me, anyway), and is one of the things that often gets overlooked by those of us with less experience. Rather than getting into a long discussion about modifying the newfs defaults across the board, what if the newfs options used were based on the size of the FS? There could be a simple rule in sysinstall that increased the newfs options from their default values if the defaults meant there would be more an x number of inodes and cg's. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.21.0012071319240.11097-100000>