From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 3 21:41:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5322F106566B for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 21:41:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sahil@tandon.net) Received: from spartan.hamla.org (spartan.hamla.org [206.251.255.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3438E8FC0A for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 21:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spartan.hamla.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4985170E6 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 17:42:18 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tandon.net; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id :subject:subject:from:from:date:date:received; s=aegis; t= 1309729338; bh=NG2kgoIeCfGddH9pK5o6rzE7RnA5rhBCDA2MXRFzyeE=; b=A 6GKZJprGM8g1AfSBLhVW9Zh4inEOvNTecXnQ3zTft8Np3GngrhnhBoDjEvhcXTkC pMmB/IxrU5QyfNwkNhGGcrH+WBG5Dj+mZ62Ak8wS2L+QXtWVQHYnfnHRW5sDDqgD q8NwOKKM/UdqvmYLLSs/6bR3vBKgQ8SmfNwtfARLn4= X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV at spartan.hamla.org Received: from spartan.hamla.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (spartan.hamla.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10027) with LMTP id vTuWj6dILpOY for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2011 17:42:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2011 17:41:47 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110703214147.GA4773@magic.hamla.org> References: <4E10BB64.9010904@missouri.edu> <20110703193906.GA4329@magic.hamla.org> <20110703205302.GA22963@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110703205302.GA22963@lonesome.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Opinions sought on location of bsd.octave.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2011 21:41:51 -0000 On Sun, 2011-07-03 at 15:53:02 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > fwiw, these ideas were most alepulver's. Speaking just for myself, I > didn't agree with most of them. > > Personally I'd rather see them all in Mk/; my view is that it saves a lot > of hunting around. Sure, Mk/ or Mk/plugins; traversing one step deeper into a directory tree is trivial from a "hunting" perspective. The main point (and takeaway from that document) for me is that the aggregation of the various Mk scripts in one location is more desirable than scattering them throughout the tree. -- Sahil Tandon