From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Feb 16 03:21:56 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D64CE06E2 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:21:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73E4D908 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:21:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id u143so2648635oif.3 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:21:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=89UgbnQ7e8DlNVlmiqDplBbASENyFMO9E9sEviDYTUo=; b=Vz0Ckr5jlpaBbZZZfCTKQN7wYQwsY7bPBxqa8MSoGwou39yN7vkqV2pVaa2UqDNlla 0XYC6c/pFAw+o3pf8qLeW57wlYnaUbUCPJAElFT/BT69iuL5paGzVmxZ2sa639x7NNZK wlw9kXz0H7GKk5ThPdrCuya4en+9IINoaZp5vmHiQU7MFkjXj0bolg1NSqJa9fUAumEr Ylj1S9F1sU7AGRMoxXaUyOrDsBiGOqhxY9FDojnvl1+bE75x50ghclBftkvP9ff75X18 Zk0WncTXk7fb6/ZgyJtjnoxhABMY8tq8r5C4/agrzEntmv8yQxJVkCEewnz0CwHkc0rR /vQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=89UgbnQ7e8DlNVlmiqDplBbASENyFMO9E9sEviDYTUo=; b=T1oSVBRie76YAEtTjq71fVgwecKglIlT3R4em1GguCr0SwFdUctzA3GDpFl7qybEtG rrByx623PI52QInV5T/OYFovkeJ29W+kpcjK2lcFvMgsYtkujK6/2RXKdNAVD7ZUpkmK lqEjf+mEefp60YANzCDmCqp44pw5EvtEBrpUbqLptxK3FGYpPBpBROYAB/JUuj1KksRj 2WDNAhQo46i6vn1AwaAH19Rd47Is9offZWpSNhPt2Xl7KF/rwau1lkY+oQNdapch+Jp8 12xV5/iYN6As/tVklTImrKwefe9+WK8NOVDNU843KUGRvR9xMBS1Qu+SjM0GimsOPnNd PzUA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kA7oEbnSlb6Dty8fcZzeoooEBtbLTaXbNzK4Zzmdmu+o5yT6efFLd4OO/KkJ0TqSQ59f9opDTWGTMqIg== X-Received: by 10.202.183.6 with SMTP id h6mr51866oif.92.1487215315785; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:21:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.74.32.79 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:21:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <0101015a3fb1a17f-dc2012c5-b4b3-47f1-b988-4291c158de72-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <20170215064101.GY2092@kib.kiev.ua> <0101015a40a20d8d-7223736a-ce71-4d31-acb6-b9cbce76e6bb-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <0101015a40a437cf-7476a87c-1750-4798-a348-548d767cb3df-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 19:21:55 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Fc6yEpF0cmdbXKXAHfAamDA-vN8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: xorg-server 1.18.4 segfaults To: Warren Block Cc: Koichiro IWAO , FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 03:21:56 -0000 On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 11:19 PM, Koichiro IWAO >> wrote: >> >> Konstantin, >>> >>>> >>>> Deinstalling llvm37 helped, thanks! >>>> >>>> >>> P.S. >>> >>> I actually deinstalled all older versions of llvm, llvm36, llvm37. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` >>> meta >>> >>> >> Isn't it about time to put a note into UPDATING that ALL versions of LLVM >> older than 3.9 (LLVM39) should be deleted "pkg delete LLVM??" before >> attempting to build the new Xorg software. I guess that includes libGL, >> libGLU, libdrm, dri and libglapi. Maybe xorg-server and xorg-drivers, too. >> Otherwise these reports are just going to keep rolling in. (Well, that >> won't stop them, but might slow them down and make it easy to tell people >> where to find the fix.) >> >> I'm still nervous about re-starting X because I may have missed something. >> > > The ports tree still thinks llvm37 is really needed by some of these, and > trying to pkg delete llvm37 wants to also delete many installed > applications. This seems wrong, but I have seen zero information about > this before, so maybe it is not just my system. I'd be willing to update > docs about this, provided someone can clarify just what information needs > to be there. `pkg delete -f llvm37' to just delete that, then an entry in > make.conf to force llvm39? > This is odd. I had llvm34 through llvm39. I only found one dependency when I deleted them, an old version of clang. (Deleted it, too.) this is on a system with full MATE desktop and almost 1500 ports. I'm really curious what might have been showing a run dependency on 37. Did you try re-building them so that they would depend on llvm39? Note: I did not have to do this on my 11-STABLE system which has by far the most ports installed.) -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683