From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Nov 14 11:11: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from blizzard.sabbo.net (blizzard.sabbo.net [193.193.218.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7183537B4C5; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 11:10:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from vic.sabbo.net (root@vic.sabbo.net [193.193.218.109]) by blizzard.sabbo.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id eAEJAmO03448; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 21:10:50 +0200 Received: from FreeBSD.org (big_brother.vega.com [192.168.1.1]) by vic.sabbo.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id eAEJAq020868; Tue, 14 Nov 2000 21:10:52 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <3A118E39.22E34294@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 21:10:49 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev Organization: Vega International Capital X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: uk,ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roger Hardiman Cc: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Adding AUTOMAKE_FLAGS to bsd.port.mk References: <3A11077A.C31A158A@cs.strath.ac.uk> <3A111032.DAC862B4@FreeBSD.org> <3A117CA7.DF54275@FreeBSD.org> <3A1180C3.71A44DA3@cs.strath.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Roger Hardiman wrote: > Maxim, Satoshi, > > The patch looks OK to me. > > However, I checked the INFO help pages for automake > and I looked like it does not use any enviroment variables. > > If it does use some environment variables, then > the AUTOMAKE_ENV additions are good. > > But could someone else confirm that automake > does use them. Several thoughts: 1. Even if *this* particular version doesn't use environment variables, there is no guarantee that some future version will not use them; 2. Environment variables potentially could be used to modify behaviour of commands invoked by automake. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message