Date: Sat, 18 Dec 1999 14:04:16 +0100 From: Gianmarco Giovannelli <gmarco@scotty.masternet.it> To: jesse reynolds <jesse@va.com.au>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using CVSUP to update the Ports collection... Message-ID: <4.2.0.58.19991218140122.009f29a0@194.184.65.4> In-Reply-To: <v04205503b48136994ecd@[1.1.1.3]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 19/12/99, jesse reynolds wrote: >Is it OK to update only the ports collection without the rest of the 'world'? If you updated the all world you have to recompile it to... >which cause it to be busy for a while downloading a fair whack of stuff. > >But it's put all the guff straight into the /usr/ports heirarchy, is this >what's supposed to happen? Yes it is ... it updates the /usr/ports/ tree directly... Best Regards, Gianmarco Giovannelli , "Unix expert since yesterday" http://www.giovannelli.it/~gmarco http://www2.masternet.it To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.58.19991218140122.009f29a0>