Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 12:14:57 +0100 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@FreeBSD.org> To: Richard Bejtlich <taosecurity@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6-stable packages on FTP servers Message-ID: <1154690097.14585.23.camel@mayday.esat.net> In-Reply-To: <120ef0530608040404x3ceecf97qe8ff6fd7ac1df94b@mail.gmail.com> References: <120ef0530608040404x3ceecf97qe8ff6fd7ac1df94b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-SvUWu4+mRSsWBbfNSkD6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 07:04 -0400, Richard Bejtlich wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I was wondering if someone could comment on the status of package > building for 6-stable. >=20 > A look at pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ shows: >=20 > Build logs (errors and otherwise) > Last full run on 6.x-current [i386 ([an error occurred while > processing this directive])] > Current run on 6.x-current [i386 (2006-07-25 05:29)] > Last full run on 6.x-stable with experimental port patches [i386 > (2006-07-28 22:57)] > Current run on 6.x-stable with experimental port patches [i386 > (2006-08-04 10:29)] >=20 > If I take a port like archivers/zip as an example, > www.freshports.org/archivers/zip shows the port was upgraded to 2.32 > on 7 July 2006. >=20 > Looking at pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-6-latest-logs/zip-2.31.lo= g.bz2 > I see >=20 > build started at Wed Jun 21 23:20:01 UTC 2006 >=20 > which might explain why 2.31 is the newest port on the FTP servers: >=20 > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All/zip-2.= 31.tbz >=20 > If I look at the "experimental" logs, however, I see 2.32 has been buildi= ng. >=20 > pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-6-exp-latest-logs/zip-2.32.log shows= : >=20 > building zip-2.32 on gohan37.freebsd.org > ... > build started at Sat Jul 29 07:51:57 UTC 2006 >=20 > In fact, I can find the package here: >=20 > pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-6-packages-latest/archivers/zip-2.32= .tbz >=20 > If the port is building, why does it not appear on the FTP servers? > This is just one concrete example, not a specific problem with one > port. Experimental means it's a build with infrastructural patches (usually taken from GNATS), so it may or may not work, but in any case, those packages are not going to the ftp servers. The packages on the ftp servers are build from an original ports tree. --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer --=-SvUWu4+mRSsWBbfNSkD6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE0ywxMxEkbVFH3PQRAj+fAKCFlzsFY0EgXCMU2RqNpgaeBUeKGwCfdqq1 AUlyIh31wIEgtvpRDkv4PWs= =m0FM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-SvUWu4+mRSsWBbfNSkD6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1154690097.14585.23.camel>