Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 20:28:47 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Any work around for this FreeBSD bug/DoS ? Message-ID: <4.1.19990817202758.0513f630@granite.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: <199908171736.KAA18291@apollo.backplane.com> References: <4.1.19990816203409.05989960@granite.sentex.ca> <4.1.19990816213403.05a3b540@granite.sentex.ca> <3.0.5.32.19990817131742.02a5f6c0@staff.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:36 PM 8/17/99 , Matthew Dillon wrote: > There have been proposals to extend the concept of per-user resources > (for example, maxproc is a per-user resource). This way you would be > able to set reasonable overall limits for the user that do not overly > restrict the per-process limits. However, nobody has attempted to > actually code the idea. It seems to me a fairly easy thing to do through > the use of the credential's cache (but I'm not volunteering). > > -Matt Do any of the existing UNIX variants out there have this level of granularity? ---Mike ********************************************************************** Mike Tancsa, Network Admin * mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications Corp, * http://www.sentex.net/mike Cambridge, Ontario * 01.519.651.3400 Canada * To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19990817202758.0513f630>