From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 10:06:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63924106564A for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:06:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net) Received: from smtp.zeninc.net (smtp.zeninc.net [80.67.176.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2208FC20 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:06:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net) Received: from astro.zen.inc (astro.zen.inc [192.168.1.239]) by smtp.zeninc.net (smtpd) with ESMTP id 9C3A72798B8; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:06:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by astro.zen.inc (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8048A1704B; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:11:39 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:11:39 +0100 From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan To: Giulio Ferro Message-ID: <20090116101139.GA19489@zeninc.net> References: <49685F15.7080605@zirakzigil.org> <20090110100357.GB2718@zeninc.net> <49688A88.4080503@zirakzigil.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <49688A88.4080503@zirakzigil.org> User-Agent: All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less. Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NATT patch on current X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:06:31 -0000 Hi. The netipsec.c patch should not have been present, it has probably been generated either by a manipulation error from myself or by some race condition between a svn up and a svn diff to produce the patch. Please test the following patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/patch-natt-test-TRUNK-2009-01-16.diff It also have updated values for INP_ESPINUDP* flags, so you DO NEED to also recompile ipsec-tools !!! The patch has been generated from a new svn diff, so it will apply cleanly. It seems to compile, but I could NOT test it as I have strange compilation issues with some other part of kernel's sources (in ata/atapci/chipsets, on which I do not have any modifications...), even with a tree without modifications and a GENERIC kernel... If that patch is ok, I'll remove soon the previous patch (http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/patch-natt-test-HEAD-2008-07-21.diff) as it contains at least one wrong patch. Yvan.