Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1996 08:25:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ron G. Minnich" <rminnich@Sarnoff.COM> To: Julian Elischer <julian@ref.tfs.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Frame relay and ATM support: virtual interface per vpi? Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960625082415.23860A-100000@terra> In-Reply-To: <199606242311.QAA03078@ref.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
virtual interface per vpi is what i'm doing for MINI. I have to: MINI looks like 4096 atm interfaces *at the hardware level*, so the carrying that through to the OS and applications makes sense. I vote for the virtual interface approach ... ron Ron Minnich |"Inferno runs on MIPS ..., Intel ..., and AMD's rminnich@sarnoff.com |29-kilobit-per-second chip-based architectures ..." (609)-734-3120 | Comm. week, may 13, pg. 4. ftp://ftp.sarnoff.com/pub/mnfs/www/docs/cluster.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.960625082415.23860A-100000>