From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org  Fri Apr  8 05:52:15 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CC42B07B3F
 for <freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Fri,  8 Apr 2016 05:52:15 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from puchar.net (puchar.net [84.10.41.61])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "puchar.net", Issuer "puchar.net" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEDCF1F13
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri,  8 Apr 2016 05:52:14 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by puchar.net (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u385oScM020754
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO)
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:50:29 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from laptop.wojtek.intra (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by laptop.wojtek.intra (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u385oTIF004256
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:50:29 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
 by laptop.wojtek.intra (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id u385oNr9004253
 for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:50:24 +0200 (CEST)
 (envelope-from wojtek@puchar.net)
X-Authentication-Warning: laptop.wojtek.intra: wojtek owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:50:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@puchar.net>
X-X-Sender: wojtek@laptop.wojtek.intra
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: IPSEC tunnels
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1604080749020.4250@laptop.wojtek.intra>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (puchar.net [10.0.1.1]); Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:50:29 +0200 (CEST)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 05:52:15 -0000

does anyone use this in production? How about performance. OpenVPN 
performance is poor due to system call/context switch on every packet.

I found lots of examples how to configure it, but none where one side is 
over NAT. Can it be configured that way? Any examples?