From nobody Sat Feb 26 13:14:08 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9817A19CD48B for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 13:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from www121.sakura.ne.jp (www121.sakura.ne.jp [153.125.133.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4K5RtZ0JnQz4p8N; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 13:14:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Received: from kalamity.joker.local (123-48-130-181.area1b.commufa.jp [123.48.130.181]) (authenticated bits=0) by www121.sakura.ne.jp (8.16.1/8.16.1/[SAKURA-WEB]/20201212) with ESMTPA id 21QDE8JR052436; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 22:14:08 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 22:14:08 +0900 From: Tomoaki AOKI To: Michael Gmelin Cc: "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Build faulure of editors/libreoffice only on src main (stable/13 is OK) Message-Id: <20220226221408.6717d4517fdafe15dfad2f20@dec.sakura.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: References: <20220226210412.f3599f415923a0b369c248bb@dec.sakura.ne.jp> Organization: Junchoon corps X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd13.0) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4K5RtZ0JnQz4p8N X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp has no SPF policy when checking 153.125.133.21) smtp.mailfrom=junchoon@dec.sakura.ne.jp X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.96 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sakura.ne.jp]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.36)[-0.363]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7684, ipnet:153.125.128.0/18, country:JP]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[123.48.130.181:received] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Thanks. But unfortunately, as I've described at Comment 21 [2] of Bug 262008, setting kern.elf64.aslr.enable=0 didn't help. As I'm building on amd64 and not built for compat32, I've not touched kern.elf32.aslr.enable. And as these are regular writable sysctl (and also are tunables, too), setting these in /boot/loader.conf and reboot before build is not tested. Should I set more sysctl's? I thought setting above actually disable all aslr related features (for 64bit), regardless its 1 ro 0. Error messages (with "MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes") and backtraces are described at Comment 20 [3]. [2] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262008#c21 [3] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262008#c20 On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 13:29:26 +0100 Michael Gmelin wrote: > Maybe it’s related to ASLR? (or is it also enabled in 13/stable?) > > > On 26. Feb 2022, at 13:05, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: > > > > 〓(Re-sent as not yet delivered in more than 5 hours) > > > > Hi. > > > > I have a build failure of editors/libreoffice on src main, amd64. > > As I've reported on Bug 262008 [1], problems on stable/13 is already > > fixed, but still fails on main with different faulure mode. > > > > A tool gengal.bin, built within whole libreoffice build, coredumps but > > it went OK on stable/13. > > > > Port options are now default on both main and stable/13. > > > > I now come to suspect the differences about toolchains within main and > > stable/13, but as editors/libreoffivce is giant and this failure > > happenes almost at the end of build, usual bisecting is not realistic. > > (Would require tens of weekends, maybe.) > > > > Any thoughts? Or am I missing something to check for? > > > > Regards. > > > > > > [1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=262008 > > > > -- > > Tomoaki AOKI > > -- 青木 知明 [Tomoaki AOKI]