From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Nov 29 00:19:17 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF53816A4CE
	for <standards@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 00:19:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C614D43FAF
	for <standards@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Nov 2003 00:19:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net)
Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201])
	by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAT8J5EG007177;
	Sat, 29 Nov 2003 00:19:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net)
Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	hAT8J4Wx003754;	Sat, 29 Nov 2003 00:19:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net)
Received: (from marcel@localhost)
	by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hAT8J4o0003753;
	Sat, 29 Nov 2003 00:19:04 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from marcel)
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 00:19:03 -0800
From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <20031129081903.GA98342@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
References: <20031129005823.GA20090@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
	<20031129161509.J4841@gamplex.bde.org>
	<20031129055619.GA48381@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
	<20031128.234325.35797703.imp@bsdimp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20031128.234325.35797703.imp@bsdimp.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: standards@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit NULL: a followup
X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Standards compliance <freebsd-standards.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>,
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-standards>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-standards@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-standards>,
	<mailto:freebsd-standards-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2003 08:19:18 -0000

On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 11:43:25PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20031129055619.GA48381@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net>
>             Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> writes:
> : Ok, so what is better (void*)0 or 0L?
> 
> ... It needs to be 0L for C++, but in C either is fine. ...

Then there's no question that 0L is better, because it doesn't break
C++. Elementary...

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel@xcllnt.net