From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 13 16:14:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D464716A4CE; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:14:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from green.homeunix.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1DGEpqJ064096; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:14:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: (from green@localhost) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1DGEoD8064095; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:14:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from green) Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:14:50 -0500 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman To: Ion-Mihai Tetcu , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050213161450.GA63697@green.homeunix.org> References: <20050210225558.7a0879ec@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> <20050213150330.GI65523@green.homeunix.org> <20050213155111.GB784@straylight.m.ringlet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050213155111.GB784@straylight.m.ringlet.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: SIGBUS help, please X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:14:52 -0000 On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 05:51:11PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 10:03:30AM -0500, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 10:55:58PM +0200, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > One of my ports - mail/dspam-devel stays at 3.4 because newer versions > > > crash on FreeBSD (they work on Linux and Solaris). > > > Can someone make some sense from the output bellow ? > > > > > > I'm willing to make a port and help with all needed setup information - > > > a 5-10 minutes job if someone has the time for it. > > > > Have you tried valgrind in any of its modes yet? > > Wasn't some valgrind output included in the message you actually > replied to? :) Or am I misunderstanding your question due to the fact > that I've never actually used valgrind? If so, sorry... Err, sorry, it makes more sense if I say "all" instead of where I said "any." There's a few of them that more check address space validity in general, and there's one that tries to check for thread-safety issues. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\